Lately I’ve been translating a scholarly article by one Park Min Gyu of the Korean Maritime Institute. In it he takes a look at U.S. Fisheries management policies and in particular at the U.S. Fisheries Conservation and Management Act of 1976 (FCMA). His goal is to review
One of the interesting things about the article is that despite mentioning a long list of other U.S. coastal and marine laws and regulations, it fails utterly to comment on the U.S. Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (CZMA). This is odd because the CZMA was the foundation upon which modern American coastal and marine management was built. It also provided the first model to which international development efforts to improve coastal management looked for guidance.
Yet this Korean article completely ignores the CZMA in favor of reviewing other U.S. legislation with much more technical and species specific goals such as the FCMA (which established ITQs), or the Anadromous Fish Conservation Act, or the Driftnet Impact Monitoring, Assessment and Control Act of 1987.
Certainly one article can’t be expected to look at everything. However there may be other reasons for the CZMA’s absence. Generally in its efforts to modernize,
Perhaps this Korean author sensed that the CZMA was culturally and politically unsuitable and decided to focus on the more technical pieces of

ghd
ReplyDeletediscount oakley sunglasses
jeremy scott adidas
burberry outlet
michael kors handbags
mont blanc pen
ralph lauren
jordan shoes
hermes outlet
michael kors handbags
hollister kids
coach outlet store online
ray ban glasses
hollister kids
hollister clothing store
jordan 11 low
moncler jackets
michael kors outlet online
ugg australia
moncler jackets
michael kors
ugg boots
ray ban glasses
michael kors outlet
burberry handbags
kate spade handbags
louis vuitton outlet
burberry outlet
christian louboutin shoes
cheap toms
michael kors uk
air jordan 11
burberry outlet
retro 11
kobe bryant shoes
mont blanc pen
uggs outlet
burberry handbags