It also put some artisanal fishers out of jobs or forced them to move to unregulated fishing grounds.
This is not a bad thing. Modern fisheries simply require fewer fishers. Wishing back those jobs is as futile as Pittsburgh wishing back its steel industry.
What I like about the policy is that it seems to have been able to act as an effective transition mechanism. Shutting down fisheries suddenly and completely is rarely possible, ICCAT has proven that. However shifting management authority closer to the fishers, or at least some of them, looks like it might be an effective way of ultimately limiting fishing pressure in a management zone. The self-interest of those fishers with management control will encourage them to crowd out other fishers.
To put it crudely the managing fishers will do the government's dirty work for it. What government couldn't do for political reasons, fishers will do for economic ones.
Communal property rights ala Mrs. Ostrom.
The only problem left, which to their credit the two chapters acknowledge, is how to get those out of work fishers new jobs.

Saved as a favorite, I love your web site!
ReplyDeleteAlso visit my web-site: tucson medical weightloss
ghd
ReplyDeletediscount oakley sunglasses
jeremy scott adidas
burberry outlet
michael kors handbags
mont blanc pen
ralph lauren
jordan shoes
hermes outlet
michael kors handbags
hollister kids
coach outlet store online
ray ban glasses
hollister kids
hollister clothing store
jordan 11 low
moncler jackets
michael kors outlet online
ugg australia
moncler jackets
michael kors
ugg boots
ray ban glasses
michael kors outlet
burberry handbags
kate spade handbags
louis vuitton outlet
burberry outlet
christian louboutin shoes
cheap toms
michael kors uk
air jordan 11
burberry outlet
retro 11
kobe bryant shoes
mont blanc pen
uggs outlet
burberry handbags